Achieving high confidence protein annotations in a sea of unknowns

Increased sensitivity of mass spectrometry (MS) technology allows deep and broad insight into community functional analyses. Metaproteomics holds the promise to reveal functional responses of natural microbial communities, whereas metagenomics alone can only hint at potential functions. The complex datasets resulting from ocean MS have the potential to inform diverse realms of the biological, chemical, and physical ocean sciences, yet the extent of bacterial functional diversity and redundancy has not been fully explored. To take advantage of these impressive datasets, we need a clear bioinformatics pipeline for metaproteomics peptide identification and annotation with a database that can provide confident identifications. Researchers must consider whether it is sufficient to leverage the vast quantities of available ocean sequence data or if they must invest in site-specific metagenomic sequencing. We have sequenced, to our knowledge, the first western arctic metagenomes from the Bering Strait and the Chukchi Sea. We have addressed the long standing question: Is a metagenome required to accurately complete metaproteomics and assess the biological distribution of metabolic functions controlling nutrient acquisition in the ocean? Two different protein databases were constructed from 1) a site-specific metagenome and 2) subarctic/arctic groups available in NCBI’s non-redundant database. Multiple proteomic search strategies were employed, against each individual database and against both databases combined, to determine the algorithm and approach that yielded the balance of high sensitivity and confident identification. Results yielded over 8200 confidently identified proteins. Our comparison of these results allows us to quantify the utility of investing resources in a metagenome versus using the constantly expanding and immediately available public databases for metaproteomic studies.