Chairs: Andrew E Schuh, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States, Mathias Goeckede, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany and Abhishek Chatterjee, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, United States
Primary Conveners: Andrew E Schuh, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States
Co-conveners: Abhishek Chatterjee, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, United States and Mathias Goeckede, MPI Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
OSPA Liaisons: Mathias Goeckede, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
A 4D-Var CO2 inversion system with NICAM-TM: development and sensitivity analyses
Yosuke Niwa1, Yosuke Fujii1, Yousuke Sawa1, Akihiko Ito2, Yosuke Iida3, Hirofumi Tomita4, Satoh Masaki5,6, Ryoichi Imasu5, Hidekazu Matsueda1, Toshinobu Machida2 and Nobuko Saigusa2, (1)Meteorological Research Institute, Ibaraki, Japan, (2)CGER-NIES, Tsukuba, Japan, (3)Japan Meteorological Agency, Tokyo, Japan, (4)RIKEN Advanced Institute for Computational Sciences, Kobe, Japan, (5)AORI The University of Tokyo, Chiba, Japan, (6)JAMSTEC Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Kanagawa, Japan
Model Analysis of the Factors Regulating Trends and Variability of Methane, Carbon Monoxide and OH
Yasin F Elshorbany1,2, Sarah A Strode1,3, James S Wang1,3 and Bryan N Duncan1, (1)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (2)Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, COLLEGE PARK, MD, United States, (3)Universities Space Research Association Columbia, Columbia, MD, United States
Using Carbonyl Sulfide Column Measurements and a Chemical Transport Model to Investigate Variability in Biospheric CO2 Fluxes
Yuting Wang1, Mathias Palm1, Nicholas M Deutscher1, Thorsten Warneke1, Justus Notholt1, Ian T Baker2, Joseph A Berry3, Parvadha Suntharalingam4, J Elliott Campbell5 and Adam Wolf6, (1)University of Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics, Bremen, Germany, (2)Colorado State University, Atmospheric Sciences, Fort Collins, CO, United States, (3)Carnegie Inst Washington, Washington, DC, United States, (4)University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom, (5)University of California Merced, Merced, CA, United States, (6)Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
Uncertainty in CO2 Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) Explains Discrepancies in a Critical Parameter for Quantifying GPP with Carbonyl Sulfide
Timothy W Hilton1, Andrew Lee Zumkehr1, Sarika Kulkarni2, Joseph A Berry3, Mary Whelan1 and J Elliott Campbell1, (1)University of California Merced, Merced, CA, United States, (2)California Air Resource Board, Sacramento, CA, United States, (3)Carnegie Inst Washington, Washington, DC, United States
The Anthropogenic Influence on Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide: Implications for Inverse Analysis of Process-Level Carbon Cycle Fluxes
Andrew Lee Zumkehr1, Timothy W Hilton1, Mary Whelan2, Stephen J Smith3 and J Elliott Campbell1, (1)University of California Merced, Merced, CA, United States, (2)University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States, (3)Joint Global Change Research Institute, College Park, MD, United States
Optimal Estimation of the Carbonyl Sulfide Surface Flux Through Inverse Modeling of TES Observations
Le Kuai1, John Worden2, Meemong Lee2, J Elliott Campbell3, Susan Sund Kulawik2 and Richard J Weidner2, (1)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (2)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)University of California Merced, Merced, CA, United States
Direct Continuous Measurements of Methane Emissions from a Landfill: Method, Station and Latest Results
George G Burba1, Liukang Xu1, Xiaomao Lin2, Jim Amen1, Karla Welding3 and Dayle K McDermitt1, (1)LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, United States, (2)Kansas State Univ, Manhattan, KS, United States, (3)Bluff Road Landfill, Lincoln, NE, United States
Investigation of methane flux in South Asia using atmospheric measurements at Nainital, India and global Eulerian-Lagrangian coupled atmospheric model
Yukio Terao1, Misa Ishizawa1, Hitoshi Mukai1, Manish Kumar Naja2, Shohei Nomura1, Toshinobu Machida1, Ruslan Zhuravlev3,4, Alexander Ganshin3,4 and Shamil S Maksyutov1, (1)National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan, (2)Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational-Sciences, Nainital, India, (3)Central Aerological Observatory, Moscow, Russia, (4)Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia
Assessing the Complementary Constraints on North American Methane Emissions Estimates Provided by Ground-based and Space-based Observations of Methane
Ilya Stanevich1, Dylan B. A. Jones1, Kim Strong1, Wei Lu1, John C Lin2, Arlyn E Andrews3, Doug E.J. Worthy4, Kevin Wecht5, Paul O Wennberg6, Debra Wunch6, Coleen Marie Roehl6 and Manvendra Krishna Dubey7, (1)University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, (2)University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States, (3)NOAA Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States, (4)Environment Canada Toronto, Climate Research Division, Toronto, ON, Canada, (5)Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States, (6)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (7)Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, United States
Parameter estimation and data assimilation with the Community Land Model (CLM) to upscale net CO2 fluxes from plot to catchment scale
Hanna Post1, Timothy J Hoar2, Jasper A Vrugt3, Xujun Han1, Roland Baatz1, Kumbhar Pramod4, Harry Vereecken1 and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen1, (1)Agrosphere Institute (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany, (2)NCAR, Boulder, CO, United States, (3)University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States, (4)École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015, Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
Characterization of a Densely Placed Carbon Observation Network
Brian Johannes Oney1, Dominik Brunner1, Stephan Henne1, Markus Leuenberger2, Ines Bamberger3 and Nicolas Gruber4, (1)Empa, Duebendorf, Switzerland, (2)Univ Bern, Bern, Switzerland, (3)ETH Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Institute for Agricultural Sciences, Zurich, Switzerland, (4)ETH Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Estimating correlations of CO and CO2 surface fluxes
Brad Weir1,2, Steven Pawson1, Lesley E Ott1, Krzysztof Wargan1,3, Jon Nielsen1,3 and Ricardo Todling1, (1)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (2)Universities Space Research Association Greenbelt, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (3)Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, MD, United States
Effect of Atmospheric CO2 Observations in Asia on the Optimization of Surface CO2 Flux
Jinwoong Kim1, Hyun Mee Kim1, Chun-Ho Cho2, Andrew R Jacobson3,4, Motoki Sasakawa5, Toshinobu Machida5, Mikhail Arshinov6 and Nikolay Fedoseev7, (1)Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea, (2)National Institute of Meteorological Research, Jeju, South Korea, (3)NOAA Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States, (4)University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States, (5)National Institute of Environmental Studies, Center for Global Environmental Research, Tsukuba, Japan, (6)Russian Academy of Sciences, V. E. Zuev Institute of Atmospheric Optics, Tomsk, Russia, (7)Russian Academy of Sciences, Melnikov Permafrost Institute, Yakutsk, Russia
Analysis of the Potential Impact of Discrepancies in Stratosphere-troposphere Exchange on Inferred Sources and Sinks of CO2
Dylan B. A. Jones1,2, Feng Deng2, Thomas W Walker2, Martin Keller2, Kevin W Bowman1,3 and Ray Nassar4, (1)University of California Los Angeles, Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, Los Angeles, CA, United States, (2)University of Toronto, Physics, Toronto, ON, Canada, (3)JPL / Caltech, Pasadena, CA, United States, (4)Environment Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada